The "anti's including Nevada casinos and religious groups opposed to the free slots games getminted expansion of gambling in the Golden State, left the battlefield long ago.
Malloy noted the irony of him being pegged as an online gambling proponent.
It is also clear that the big money will be earned by the hub operators, not the skins.
But the bill requires a scoring system, with factors including "quality, competence, experience, past performance, efficiency, reliability, financial viability, durability, adaptability, timely performance, integrity, security, and the consideration promised to the state."."We're going to have Internet gambling in Massachusetts, in Connecticut, in Rhode Island, in California, in Nevada and Mississippi and Alabama and I could go through all 50 states because the Internet is the Internet.But the polls show him in a virtual tie with the Republican nominee, Meg Whitman.So expect the Democratic Party to push this through before November.The Great Recession added a new, and even more powerful, political force: the Democratic Party and even parts of the GOP.The tribal casino industry in California is already about the size of Nevada's privately owned casinos, and it will surpass it in gross gaming revenue within a few years.Yet now the biggest argument that proponents trot out is that gambling is everywhere - so why should our state's potential revenues go to some neighboring state?But times have changed.The right-wing ideologues of President George.In fact, it is expected that the hub operators will also be taking bets directly from players.In fact, SB 1485 expressly gives preferences to cardclubs and tribes.Issue #63 Â Copyright 2010.State-run gambling has become so pervasive that only the holdouts look like suckers.United States of America, phone: (925) 426-7600, fax: (925) 426-7599.
United States of America, phone: (916) 263-3340, fax: (916) 263-3341.
Interestingly, SB 1485 never says what those hubs are for.